with a representative OR  
 
  Home > Patient > Information_Center > Articles : Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection
Printer-Friendly Page     
Article Library

What is Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection?

Paul J. Turek, M.D.
Associate Professor of Urology, Ob-Gyn and Reproductive Services
Director of the Male Reproductive Laboratory

University of California, San Francisco

"What Nature does blindly, slowly, and ruthlessly,
man may do providently, quickly and kindly."
--Francis Galton, 1905.

Introduction

As a technique to help infertile couples conceive, in vitro fertilization (IVF) is now over 20 years old. It involves controlled ovarian stimulation and ultrasound-guided transvaginal egg retrieval from the ovaries prior to ovulation. Eggs are then fertilized in petri dishes (small plastic dishes)with 500,000 to 5 million motile sperm. In the late 1980's, many investigators attempted to improve IVF success by further manipulating the oocyte and its coverings (the zona pellucida) to enhance fertilization success. Techniques such as partial zona dissection and sub-zonal insemination (SUZI) were reported to decrease even further the number of sperm required to achieve a pregnancy in vitro. With SUZI, good oocyte fertilization rates were obtained with fewer than 20 motile sperm. In 1992, a revolutionary advance in such manipulation techniques was described by Jean-Pierro Palermo and colleagues at the Dutch-speaking Brussels Free University in Belgium. In this laboratory accident, sperm were injected directly into the cytoplasm of the egg in a technique now termed intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). Since then, ICSI has replaced all prior micromanipulation techniques and has become a routine treatment for infertility throughout the world.

Remarkably, the sperm requirement for egg fertilization dropped from hundreds of thousands for IVF, to 1 viable sperm for ICSI. This has led to the development of aggressive new surgical techniques to provide viable sperm for egg fertilization from men with no sperm in the ejaculates, pushing urologists beyond the ejaculate and into the male reproductive tract to find sperm. Present sources of sperm in azoospermic (no ejaculated sperm) patients include the vas deferens, epididymis and testicle. In some centers, fertilization rates using retrieved sperm virtually approximate those obtained with normal, ejaculated sperm.

Given that so few sperm are needed for success with ICSI, many kinds of male factor infertility previously deemed untreatable are, for the first time in history, associated with biological paternity, including conditions like Klinefelter and prune belly syndrome as well as other forms of genetic infertility. At present ICSI is indicated for: 1) failed fertilization with IVF alone; 2) sperm retrieved from the reproductive tract; 3) ejaculated sperm of very low density or motility, and 4) ejaculated sperm with very poor morphology (sperm shape).

ICSI Risks and Outcomes

Although a truly revolutionary technique, there are several concerns about ICSI, mainly because its application in humans was not preceded by work in animal models.

  1. We are not God or Darwin.
    Because neither God nor Darwin chooses the sperm to be injected into the oocyte, we must assume that many of the natural selection barriers that exist during natural fertilization are bypassed. As such, genetic defects that caused the infertility are expected to be passed on to offspring unabated. This has already been demonstrated in certain cases of male genetic infertility. Informed consent of patients on this issue is critical in cases of suspected genetic causes of infertility. It is also the rationale behind the recent increased use of genetic counselors in infertility programs all over the world. At UCSF, we have instituted PROGENI (Program in the Genetics of Infertility), a genetic counseling and testing program for infertile patients.

  2. Does ICSI Induce Birth Defects?
    In the absence of relevant data from experimental models, is very important that the safety of ICSI be evaluated for the risk of congenital malformations. Although it is an accepted fact that children born to IVF are as healthy as those conceived normally, any additional risk brought to bear on children's health after conception with ICSI needs to be assessed. Comparative data on perinatal and morphological investigations of children born by IVF or IVF-ICSI to age-matched parents at several centers have revealed no increase in perinatal or neonatal complications with ICSI. In addition, there are no clearly identifiable birth defects associated with ICSI.


  3. Does ICSI Induce Chromosomal Abnormalities in Children?
    There is sufficient evidence to suggest that ICSI is associated with a statistically higher likelihood of producing offspring with chromosomal abnormalities when compared to natural conception. The likelihood that a child conceived with ICSI will have a sex chromosomal abnormality is 4 fold higher (0.83%) than normal (0.2%). At present, we do not know why there is an increased risk for children conceived with ICSI. Two possibilities are: 1) the sperm used in the procedure is abnormal or 2) the procedure itself leads to an increased risk of sex chromosome abnormalities. Some of the problems that may occur with sex chromosome abnormalities include: increased risk of miscarriage of affected embryos, heart problems for affected infants that may require surgery, specific behavior or learning difficulties for affected children and adults and infertility as adults for affected offspring. PROGENI now recommends genetic counseling and consideration of a prenatal diagnosis procedure, such as chorionic villus sampling or amniocentesis, for couples planning ICSI.


  4. Does ICSI Affect Childhood Development?
    This issue is less clear and more controversial than the chromsosomal findings in ICSI children. One study that suggests a higher rate of developmental delay at 1 year of age for children conceived with ICSI compared to natural and IVF conception. This difference was noted in the mental development index but not the psychomotor index of the Bayley Scales of Infant Development. However, these data have been disputed by the results from two other centers that report no difference in mental development in 2 year old children conceived with ICSI when compared to those naturally conceived. This issue is not resolved by any means and suggests the importance of longterm followup of individuals conceived with ICSI.

Summary

ICSI is certainly a revolutionary advance in assisted reproductive technology. Many couples with previously untreatable forms of infertility can now conceive with the use of this technique. However, its also has associated risks that mandate informed consent from eligible couples.

Paul J. Turek M.D.
Associate Professor of Urology, Ob-Gyn and Reproductive Sciences
Director, Male Reproductive Laboratory
University of California, San Francisco
2330 Post Street
6th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94115-1695
Tel: 415-353-7344 Fax: 415-353-7252