Surrogacy - Medical and Ethical Considerations
Craig L. Best, M.D., M.P.H.
Assistant Clinical Professor of Obstetrics, Gynecology
and Reproductive Biology
Harvard Medical School
The practice of surrogacy as a means to have a child is
often met with uneasiness. Public perceptions have
been heavily influenced by several well-publicized
cases in the media that have highlighted some of the
difficulties and conflicts that may arise with this
method of attaining parenthood. However, the majority
of surrogacy arrangements have positive outcomes and
have enabled many women and couples to overcome infertility
and become parents.
The traditional concept of motherhood embodies a combination of
genetic, biological, social and legal factors.
With the rapid advancement of reproductive technologies,
it is now possible to separate these aspects
of parenthood. A genetic mother supplies the
genetic material, or egg. A biological mother
carries the child in her uterus during pregnancy.
A rearing mother raises the child after birth.
In general, the mother who raises a child is
recognized by society as the childs mother,
with all of the social and legal responsibilities
that accompany parenthood.
In surrogacy, the biological and, sometimes, genetic
aspects of childbearing are separated from parental
rights and responsibilities through an agreement
to transfer the infant at birth. There are two
types of surrogacy that are practiced traditional
surrogacy and gestational surrogacy. Traditional
surrogacy is more common and has been around
since biblical times. In traditional surrogacy,
a woman contracts with an infertile couple to
provide her egg(s) and uterus in an effort to
produce a child for the couple. The surrogate
is inseminated with sperm from the man of the
infertile couple. If she conceives, she carries
and delivers the child. The surrogate, therefore,
is both the biological and genetic mother. The
child is then adopted by the infertile couple
in accordance with the pre-pregnancy agreement
drawn up by an attorney for the parties involved.
Included in the pre-pregnancy agreement is a
financial compensation for the surrogate who
has devoted much time and energy and has accepted
the risks and inconveniences of pregnancy. Women
who are candidates for this procedure are those
with no eggs, poor egg quality, or women with
a severely scarred uterine lining (i.e., Ashermans
syndrome). Other reasons for considering surrogacy
include significant medical problems that may
put a woman at great risk during pregnancy and
the presence of undesirable genetic traits in
a woman that have a high likelihood of being
passed on to an unborn child. Surrogacy is attractive
to some infertile couples as it allows them to
have a child who is the genetic offspring of
the father. Often, couples entering into such
an arrangement have a greater sense of control
than with adoption.
In gestational surrogacy, also called gestational
care and host-uterus, the genetic parents are
also the intended parents. The first reported
birth from gestational surrogacy was in 1986.
This option has only been available since the
advent of in vitro fertilization with the ability
to extract eggs from one woman, fertilize them
outside of her body with sperm from her husband
or partner, and replace on or more fertilized
eggs, or embryos, into another womans uterus.
In this situation, the development of the lining
of the uterus is controlled through hormone administration
and must be synchronous with egg development
in the other woman. If one or more embryos implant,
the gestational carrier proceeds with the pregnancy.
After delivery, the child(ren) are raised by
the genetic parents. The gestational carrier
may be known (e.g., a sister) or unknown to the
infertile couple before the arrangement is finalized.
It is recommended, and sometimes required by
fertility programs, that both parties have legal
representation for gestational surrogacy, even
if the women are related to one another. Financial
compensation is the rule for unknown gestational
carriers but may not be requested when a woman
well-known to the couple is performing this service
for altruistic reasons. Reasons for considering
gestational surrogacy include situations where
a womans uterus is surgically or congenitally
absent, malformed, or unable to allow implantation
or normal fetal development. In addition, women
with severe health problems in whom pregnancy
poses a significant risk might consider this
option. This arrangement is attractive to some
infertile couples as it allows them to have a
child who is their genetic offspring when carrying
a pregnancy is impossible or dangerous.
What has concerned people about these available treatments
is whether they are right, or ethical, and whether
they should be allowed. When dealing with ethics,
there are three main principles that must be
kept in mind: (1) Respect for persons. This
involves the respect for an individuals
wishes (autonomy), so long as they are competent
to make informed decisions. (2) Beneficence.This
goes beyond the ethic of, "Do no harm, " by
imposing a duty to advance the welfare of individuals. (3)
Justice. This underscores the importance
of fairness in dealing with all parties involved.
In both traditional and gestational surrogacy,
there is usually no questions that the pregnancy
is planned and very desired by the infertile
couple. The ethical issues that surround these
treatments have to do with the carrier, or surrogate,
who undertakes the risks of pregnancy without
anticipating the rewards of parenthood. Questions
may arise about whether the surrogate is being
coerced into accepting this arrangement. In traditional
surrogacy, the lure of money may raise the issue
of whether wealthier women and couples are taking
advantage of poorer women. In gestational surrogacy
using a relative as the carrier, there may be
unspoken pressures to comply with the desires
of the infertile couples wishes. Other
issues that have been raised are whether traditional
surrogacy amounts to "baby buying." In
addition to these ethical issues, it is often
difficult to know how the relationships among
all involved individuals will be affected if
success is achieved. Expectations of how the
surrogate, or carrier, will relate to the infertile
couple and their child may differ vastly. It
is also difficult to predict whether the surrogate,
or carrier, will change her mind during the pregnancy
and decide she wants to keep the child. Although
not likely to occur, it is often this issue that
concerns people most when considering surrogacy
or gestational care.
The importance of pre-treatment counseling of all
parties involved by a trained mental health professional
cannot be minimized. This type of counseling
can help people to confront their concerns and
decide whether this treatment is appropriate
for them. An attorney familiar with matters pertaining
to reproductive choice and rights must also be
involved to assist the involved individuals in
drawing up a fair contract. It must be made clear
that the surrogate, or gestational carrier, has
the right to make all decisions regarding prenatal
care and procedures. Issues such as amniocentesis
or whether to abort a child with known genetic
or structural abnormalities must be discussed
in detail before the infertile couple and surrogate
enter into an arrangement.
In summary, the ethical, legal, medical, social,
and psychological issues involved in traditional
and gestational surrogacy are numerous and complex.
Each of these areas must be explored in detail
by couples and individuals contemplating such
treatments before making decisions regarding
whether these options are appropriate for them.
Above all, the most important underlying principles
are that children should not be conceived unless
there is a loving family to receive them and
that no one should be exploited in the process.

|